Commit 19fa1a67 authored by Joe Thornber's avatar Joe Thornber Committed by Mike Snitzer
Browse files

dm thin: fix discard support to a previously shared block

If a snapshot is created and later deleted the origin dm_thin_device's
snapshotted_time will have been updated to reflect the snapshot's
creation time.  The 'shared' flag in the dm_thin_lookup_result struct
returned from dm_thin_find_block() is an approximation based on
snapshotted_time -- this is done to avoid 0(n), or worse, time
complexity.  In this case, the shared flag would be true.

But because the 'shared' flag reflects an approximation a block can be
incorrectly assumed to be shared (e.g. false positive for 'shared'
because the snapshot no longer exists).  This could result in discards
issued to a thin device not being passed down to the pool's underlying
data device.

To fix this we double check that a thin block is really still in-use
after a mapping is removed using dm_pool_block_is_used().  If the
reference count for a block is now zero the discard is allowed to be
passed down.

Also add a 'definitely_not_shared' member to the dm_thin_new_mapping
structure -- reflects that the 'shared' flag in the response from
dm_thin_find_block() can only be held as definitive if false is
returned.

Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043527

Signed-off-by: default avatarJoe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
parent 16961b04
......@@ -1349,6 +1349,12 @@ dm_thin_id dm_thin_dev_id(struct dm_thin_device *td)
return td->id;
}
/*
* Check whether @time (of block creation) is older than @td's last snapshot.
* If so then the associated block is shared with the last snapshot device.
* Any block on a device created *after* the device last got snapshotted is
* necessarily not shared.
*/
static bool __snapshotted_since(struct dm_thin_device *td, uint32_t time)
{
return td->snapshotted_time > time;
......@@ -1458,6 +1464,20 @@ int dm_thin_remove_block(struct dm_thin_device *td, dm_block_t block)
return r;
}
int dm_pool_block_is_used(struct dm_pool_metadata *pmd, dm_block_t b, bool *result)
{
int r;
uint32_t ref_count;
down_read(&pmd->root_lock);
r = dm_sm_get_count(pmd->data_sm, b, &ref_count);
if (!r)
*result = (ref_count != 0);
up_read(&pmd->root_lock);
return r;
}
bool dm_thin_changed_this_transaction(struct dm_thin_device *td)
{
int r;
......
......@@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ int dm_pool_get_data_block_size(struct dm_pool_metadata *pmd, sector_t *result);
int dm_pool_get_data_dev_size(struct dm_pool_metadata *pmd, dm_block_t *result);
int dm_pool_block_is_used(struct dm_pool_metadata *pmd, dm_block_t b, bool *result);
/*
* Returns -ENOSPC if the new size is too small and already allocated
* blocks would be lost.
......
......@@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ struct dm_thin_new_mapping {
unsigned quiesced:1;
unsigned prepared:1;
unsigned pass_discard:1;
unsigned definitely_not_shared:1;
struct thin_c *tc;
dm_block_t virt_block;
......@@ -683,7 +684,15 @@ static void process_prepared_discard_passdown(struct dm_thin_new_mapping *m)
cell_defer_no_holder(tc, m->cell2);
if (m->pass_discard)
remap_and_issue(tc, m->bio, m->data_block);
if (m->definitely_not_shared)
remap_and_issue(tc, m->bio, m->data_block);
else {
bool used = false;
if (dm_pool_block_is_used(tc->pool->pmd, m->data_block, &used) || used)
bio_endio(m->bio, 0);
else
remap_and_issue(tc, m->bio, m->data_block);
}
else
bio_endio(m->bio, 0);
......@@ -1036,7 +1045,8 @@ static void process_discard(struct thin_c *tc, struct bio *bio)
*/
m = get_next_mapping(pool);
m->tc = tc;
m->pass_discard = (!lookup_result.shared) && pool->pf.discard_passdown;
m->pass_discard = pool->pf.discard_passdown;
m->definitely_not_shared = !lookup_result.shared;
m->virt_block = block;
m->data_block = lookup_result.block;
m->cell = cell;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment