Commit 87b28417 authored by Mark Brown's avatar Mark Brown
Browse files

regulator: core: Replace checks of have_full_constraints with a function

Simple code reorganisation so we can change the logic for deciding what
full constraints are more easily.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <>
parent 6ce4eac1
......@@ -119,6 +119,11 @@ static const char *rdev_get_name(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
return "";
static bool have_full_constraints(void)
return has_full_constraints;
* of_get_regulator - get a regulator device node based on supply name
* @dev: Device pointer for the consumer (of regulator) device
......@@ -1340,7 +1345,7 @@ static struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id,
* Assume that a regulator is physically present and enabled
* even if it isn't hooked up and just provide a dummy.
if (has_full_constraints && allow_dummy) {
if (have_full_constraints() && allow_dummy) {
pr_warn("%s supply %s not found, using dummy regulator\n",
devname, id);
......@@ -3624,7 +3629,7 @@ int regulator_suspend_finish(void)
if (error)
ret = error;
} else {
if (!has_full_constraints)
if (!have_full_constraints())
goto unlock;
if (!ops->disable)
goto unlock;
......@@ -3822,7 +3827,7 @@ static int __init regulator_init_complete(void)
if (!enabled)
goto unlock;
if (has_full_constraints) {
if (have_full_constraints()) {
/* We log since this may kill the system if it
* goes wrong. */
rdev_info(rdev, "disabling\n");
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment