Commit ef5ab89c authored by Bruce Allan's avatar Bruce Allan Committed by Jeff Kirsher
Browse files

e1000e: use dev_kfree_skb_irq() instead of dev_kfree_skb()



Based on a report and patch originally submitted by Prasanna Panchamukhi.

Use dev_kfree_skb_irq() in e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq() since this latter
function is called only in interrupt context.  This avoids "Warning:
kfree_skb on hard IRQ" messages.

Cc: "Prasanna S. Panchamukhi" <prasanna.panchamukhi@riverbed.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarJeff Pieper <jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
parent 23633b13
......@@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ static bool e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
/* an error means any chain goes out the window
* too */
if (rx_ring->rx_skb_top)
dev_kfree_skb(rx_ring->rx_skb_top);
dev_kfree_skb_irq(rx_ring->rx_skb_top);
rx_ring->rx_skb_top = NULL;
goto next_desc;
}
......@@ -1395,7 +1395,7 @@ static bool e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
/* eth type trans needs skb->data to point to something */
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN)) {
e_err("pskb_may_pull failed.\n");
dev_kfree_skb(skb);
dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
goto next_desc;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment