Commit fe24e271 authored by Josh Poimboeuf's avatar Josh Poimboeuf Committed by Ingo Molnar
Browse files

objtool: Fix segfault in ignore_unreachable_insn()



Peter Zijlstra's patch for converting WARN() to use UD2 triggered a
bunch of false "unreachable instruction" warnings, which then triggered
a seg fault in ignore_unreachable_insn().

The seg fault happened when it tried to dereference a NULL 'insn->func'
pointer.  Thanks to static_cpu_has(), some functions can jump to a
non-function area in the .altinstr_aux section.  That breaks
ignore_unreachable_insn()'s assumption that it's always inside the
original function.

Make sure ignore_unreachable_insn() only follows jumps within the
current function.
Reported-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bace77a60d5af9b45eddb8f8fb9c776c8de657ef.1518130694.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com

Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 9279ddf2
......@@ -1935,13 +1935,19 @@ static bool ignore_unreachable_insn(struct instruction *insn)
if (is_kasan_insn(insn) || is_ubsan_insn(insn))
return true;
if (insn->type == INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL && insn->jump_dest) {
insn = insn->jump_dest;
continue;
if (insn->type == INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL) {
if (insn->jump_dest &&
insn->jump_dest->func == insn->func) {
insn = insn->jump_dest;
continue;
}
break;
}
if (insn->offset + insn->len >= insn->func->offset + insn->func->len)
break;
insn = list_next_entry(insn, list);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment