Commit 4ce61d1c authored by Satyam Sharma's avatar Satyam Sharma Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

[BLUETOOTH]: Fix locking in hci_sock_dev_event().



We presently use lock_sock() to acquire a lock on a socket in
hci_sock_dev_event(), but this goes BUG because lock_sock()
can sleep and we're already holding a read-write spinlock at
that point. So, we must use the non-sleeping BH version,
bh_lock_sock().

However, hci_sock_dev_event() is called from user context and
hence using simply bh_lock_sock() will deadlock against a
concurrent softirq that tries to acquire a lock on the same
socket. Hence, disabling BH's before acquiring the socket lock
and enable them afterwards, is the proper solution to fix
socket locking in hci_sock_dev_event().
Signed-off-by: default avatarSatyam Sharma <ssatyam@cse.iitk.ac.in>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 689d7946
......@@ -665,7 +665,8 @@ static int hci_sock_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event,
/* Detach sockets from device */
read_lock(&hci_sk_list.lock);
sk_for_each(sk, node, &hci_sk_list.head) {
lock_sock(sk);
local_bh_disable();
bh_lock_sock_nested(sk);
if (hci_pi(sk)->hdev == hdev) {
hci_pi(sk)->hdev = NULL;
sk->sk_err = EPIPE;
......@@ -674,7 +675,8 @@ static int hci_sock_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event,
hci_dev_put(hdev);
}
release_sock(sk);
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
local_bh_enable();
}
read_unlock(&hci_sk_list.lock);
}
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment