Commit b2bbb642 authored by Julia Lawall's avatar Julia Lawall Committed by Martin Schwidefsky
Browse files

[S390] cio: Correct use of ! and &

In commit e6bafba5, a bug was fixed that
involved converting !x & y to !(x & y).  The code below shows the same
pattern, and thus should perhaps be fixed in the same way.  In particular,
the result of !scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw) & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND is
always just !scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw).

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/

)

// <smpl>
@@ expression E; constant C; @@
(
  !E & !C
|
- !E & C
+ !(E & C)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
parent f9c9fe3e
......@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int chsc_examine_irb(struct chsc_request *request)
{
int backed_up;
if (!scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw) & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND)
if (!(scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw) & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND))
return -EIO;
backed_up = scsw_cstat(&request->irb.scsw) & SCHN_STAT_CHAIN_CHECK;
request->irb.scsw.cmd.cstat &= ~SCHN_STAT_CHAIN_CHECK;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment