1. 12 Jan, 2006 2 commits
  2. 10 Jan, 2006 9 commits
  3. 09 Jan, 2006 1 commit
  4. 06 Jan, 2006 4 commits
  5. 09 Nov, 2005 3 commits
    • Nick Piggin's avatar
      [PATCH] sched: resched and cpu_idle rework · 64c7c8f8
      Nick Piggin authored
      
      
      Make some changes to the NEED_RESCHED and POLLING_NRFLAG to reduce
      confusion, and make their semantics rigid.  Improves efficiency of
      resched_task and some cpu_idle routines.
      
      * In resched_task:
      - TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only cleared with the task's runqueue lock held,
        and as we hold it during resched_task, then there is no need for an
        atomic test and set there. The only other time this should be set is
        when the task's quantum expires, in the timer interrupt - this is
        protected against because the rq lock is irq-safe.
      
      - If TIF_NEED_RESCHED is set, then we don't need to do anything. It
        won't get unset until the task get's schedule()d off.
      
      - If we are running on the same CPU as the task we resched, then set
        TIF_NEED_RESCHED and no further action is required.
      
      - If we are running on another CPU, and TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is *not* set
        after TIF_NEED_RESCHED has been set, then we need to send an IPI.
      
      Using these rules, we are able to remove the test and set operation in
      resched_task, and make clear the previously vague semantics of
      POLLING_NRFLAG.
      
      * In idle routines:
      - Enter cpu_idle with preempt disabled. When the need_resched() condition
        becomes true, explicitly call schedule(). This makes things a bit clearer
        (IMO), but haven't updated all architectures yet.
      
      - Many do a test and clear of TIF_NEED_RESCHED for some reason. According
        to the resched_task rules, this isn't needed (and actually breaks the
        assumption that TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only cleared with the runqueue lock
        held). So remove that. Generally one less locked memory op when switching
        to the idle thread.
      
      - Many idle routines clear TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG, and only set it in the inner
        most polling idle loops. The above resched_task semantics allow it to be
        set until before the last time need_resched() is checked before going into
        a halt requiring interrupt wakeup.
      
        Many idle routines simply never enter such a halt, and so POLLING_NRFLAG
        can be always left set, completely eliminating resched IPIs when rescheduling
        the idle task.
      
        POLLING_NRFLAG width can be increased, to reduce the chance of resched IPIs.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      64c7c8f8
    • Nick Piggin's avatar
      [PATCH] sched: disable preempt in idle tasks · 5bfb5d69
      Nick Piggin authored
      
      
      Run idle threads with preempt disabled.
      
      Also corrected a bugs in arm26's cpu_idle (make it actually call schedule()).
      How did it ever work before?
      
      Might fix the CPU hotplugging hang which Nigel Cunningham noted.
      
      We think the bug hits if the idle thread is preempted after checking
      need_resched() and before going to sleep, then the CPU offlined.
      
      After calling stop_machine_run, the CPU eventually returns from preemption and
      into the idle thread and goes to sleep.  The CPU will continue executing
      previous idle and have no chance to call play_dead.
      
      By disabling preemption until we are ready to explicitly schedule, this bug is
      fixed and the idle threads generally become more robust.
      
      From: alexs <ashepard@u.washington.edu>
      
        PPC build fix
      
      From: Yoichi Yuasa <yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp>
      
        MIPS build fix
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarYoichi Yuasa <yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      5bfb5d69
    • Adrian Bunk's avatar
      [PATCH] s390: "extern inline" -> "static inline" · 4448aaf0
      Adrian Bunk authored
      
      
      "extern inline" -> "static inline"
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      4448aaf0
  6. 07 Nov, 2005 5 commits
  7. 31 Oct, 2005 4 commits
  8. 29 Sep, 2005 1 commit
  9. 17 Sep, 2005 3 commits
  10. 12 Sep, 2005 1 commit
    • Tsuneo.Yoshioka@f-secure.com's avatar
      [PATCH] x86-64: Fix 32bit sendfile · 83b942bd
      Tsuneo.Yoshioka@f-secure.com authored
      
      
      If we use 64bit kernel on ia64/x86_64/s390 architecture, and we run
      32bit binary on 32bit compatibility mode, sendfile system call seems be
      not set offset argument.
      
      This is because sendfile's return value is not zero but the code regards
      the result by return value is zero or not.
      
      This problem will be affect to ia64/x86_64/s390 and not affect to other
      architecture does not affect other architecture (mips/parisc/ppc64/sparc64).
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      83b942bd
  11. 09 Sep, 2005 1 commit
  12. 07 Sep, 2005 1 commit
  13. 05 Sep, 2005 3 commits
  14. 29 Aug, 2005 1 commit
    • Steven Rostedt's avatar
      [PATCH] convert signal handling of NODEFER to act like other Unix boxes. · 69be8f18
      Steven Rostedt authored
      
      
      It has been reported that the way Linux handles NODEFER for signals is
      not consistent with the way other Unix boxes handle it.  I've written a
      program to test the behavior of how this flag affects signals and had
      several reports from people who ran this on various Unix boxes,
      confirming that Linux seems to be unique on the way this is handled.
      
      The way NODEFER affects signals on other Unix boxes is as follows:
      
      1) If NODEFER is set, other signals in sa_mask are still blocked.
      
      2) If NODEFER is set and the signal is in sa_mask, then the signal is
      still blocked. (Note: this is the behavior of all tested but Linux _and_
      NetBSD 2.0 *).
      
      The way NODEFER affects signals on Linux:
      
      1) If NODEFER is set, other signals are _not_ blocked regardless of
      sa_mask (Even NetBSD doesn't do this).
      
      2) If NODEFER is set and the signal is in sa_mask, then the signal being
      handled is not blocked.
      
      The patch converts signal handling in all current Linux architectures to
      the way most Unix boxes work.
      
      Unix boxes that were tested:  DU4, AIX 5.2, Irix 6.5, NetBSD 2.0, SFU
      3.5 on WinXP, AIX 5.3, Mac OSX, and of course Linux 2.6.13-rcX.
      
      * NetBSD was the only other Unix to behave like Linux on point #2. The
      main concern was brought up by point #1 which even NetBSD isn't like
      Linux.  So with this patch, we leave NetBSD as the lonely one that
      behaves differently here with #2.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      69be8f18
  15. 24 Aug, 2005 1 commit