Skip to content
  • Lee Schermerhorn's avatar
    mmap: avoid unnecessary anon_vma lock acquisition in vma_adjust() · 252c5f94
    Lee Schermerhorn authored
    
    
    We noticed very erratic behavior [throughput] with the AIM7 shared
    workload running on recent distro [SLES11] and mainline kernels on an
    8-socket, 32-core, 256GB x86_64 platform.  On the SLES11 kernel
    [2.6.27.19+] with Barcelona processors, as we increased the load [10s of
    thousands of tasks], the throughput would vary between two "plateaus"--one
    at ~65K jobs per minute and one at ~130K jpm.  The simple patch below
    causes the results to smooth out at the ~130k plateau.
    
    But wait, there's more:
    
    We do not see this behavior on smaller platforms--e.g., 4 socket/8 core.
    This could be the result of the larger number of cpus on the larger
    platform--a scalability issue--or it could be the result of the larger
    number of interconnect "hops" between some nodes in this platform and how
    the tasks for a given load end up distributed over the nodes' cpus and
    memories--a stochastic NUMA effect.
    
    The variability in the results are less pronounced [on the same platform]
    with Shanghai processors and with mainline kernels.  With 31-rc6 on
    Shanghai processors and 288 file systems on 288 fibre attached storage
    volumes, the curves [jpm vs load] are both quite flat with the patched
    kernel consistently producing ~3.9% better throughput [~80K jpm vs ~77K
    jpm] than the unpatched kernel.
    
    Profiling indicated that the "slow" runs were incurring high[er]
    contention on an anon_vma lock in vma_adjust(), apparently called from the
    sbrk() system call.
    
    The patch:
    
    A comment in mm/mmap.c:vma_adjust() suggests that we don't really need the
    anon_vma lock when we're only adjusting the end of a vma, as is the case
    for brk().  The comment questions whether it's worth while to optimize for
    this case.  Apparently, on the newer, larger x86_64 platforms, with
    interesting NUMA topologies, it is worth while--especially considering
    that the patch [if correct!] is quite simple.
    
    We can detect this condition--no overlap with next vma--by noting a NULL
    "importer".  The anon_vma pointer will also be NULL in this case, so
    simply avoid loading vma->anon_vma to avoid the lock.
    
    However, we DO need to take the anon_vma lock when we're inserting a vma
    ['insert' non-NULL] even when we have no overlap [NULL "importer"], so we
    need to check for 'insert', as well.  And Hugh points out that we should
    also take it when adjusting vm_start (so that rmap.c can rely upon
    vma_address() while it holds the anon_vma lock).
    
    akpm: Zhang Yanmin reprts a 150% throughput improvement with aim7, so it
    might be -stable material even though thiss isn't a regression: "this
    issue is not clear on dual socket Nehalem machine (2*4*2 cpu), but is
    severe on large machine (4*8*2 cpu)"
    
    [hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk: test vma start too]
    Signed-off-by: default avatarLee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarHugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
    Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
    Cc: Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
    Tested-by: default avatar"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
    Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
    252c5f94