-
With GCC 9.2.1 net/nfs.c leads to multiple errors of type address-of-packed-member. net/nfs.c: In function ‘rpc_req’: net/nfs.c:199:18: error: taking address of packed member of ‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Werror=address-of-packed-member] 199 | p = (uint32_t *)&(rpc_pkt.u.call.data); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/nfs.c: In function ‘nfs_readlink_reply’: net/nfs.c:631:46: error: taking address of packed member of ‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Werror=address-of-packed-member] 631 | nfs3_get_attributes_offset(rpc_pkt.u.reply.data); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ LD drivers/block/built-in.o net/nfs.c: In function ‘nfs_read_reply’: net/nfs.c:692:46: error: taking address of packed member of ‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Werror=address-of-packed-member] 692 | nfs3_get_attributes_offset(rpc_pkt.u.reply.data); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ struct rpc_t is only used as local variable. It is naturally packed. So there is no need for the attribute packed. Signed-off-by:
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Reviewed-by:
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>
With GCC 9.2.1 net/nfs.c leads to multiple errors of type address-of-packed-member. net/nfs.c: In function ‘rpc_req’: net/nfs.c:199:18: error: taking address of packed member of ‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Werror=address-of-packed-member] 199 | p = (uint32_t *)&(rpc_pkt.u.call.data); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/nfs.c: In function ‘nfs_readlink_reply’: net/nfs.c:631:46: error: taking address of packed member of ‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Werror=address-of-packed-member] 631 | nfs3_get_attributes_offset(rpc_pkt.u.reply.data); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ LD drivers/block/built-in.o net/nfs.c: In function ‘nfs_read_reply’: net/nfs.c:692:46: error: taking address of packed member of ‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Werror=address-of-packed-member] 692 | nfs3_get_attributes_offset(rpc_pkt.u.reply.data); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ struct rpc_t is only used as local variable. It is naturally packed. So there is no need for the attribute packed. Signed-off-by:
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Reviewed-by:
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>